Science and Management Resources, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that if plaintiff's allegations wei’e “found meritorious, then ‘all of the agency’s ratings would need to be redone, and a new best value determination made,” ’ thus plaintiffs allegations satisfy standing
• finding plaintiff had standing where it alleged “systemic defects” in evaluation process and it was “not entirely clear which of the bidders would be next in line” if the evaluation process had to be redone
• “To establish prejudice, a protester is not required to show that but for the alleged error, the protester would have been awarded the contract.”
• “To establish prejudice, a protester is not required to show that but for the alleged error, the protester would have been awarded the contract.”
• “To establish prejudice, a protester is not required to show that but for the alleged error, the protester would have been awarded the contract.”
• “To establish prejudice, a protester is not required to show that but for the alleged error, the protester would have been awarded the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).