SCICO TEC GMBH v. Boston Scientific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defendant’s attempt to incorporate arguments and authorities raised in claim construction briefing were not proper objections
• noting the “failure to object to a report and recommendation bars attack on appeal of findings of fact and conclusions of law except on very limited plain error grounds”
• noting the “failure to object to a report and recommendation bars attack on appeal of findings of fact and conclusions of law except on very limited plain error grounds.”
• “[O]bjections to a magistrate judge’s order cannot simply be a demand that a district judge conduct a de novo review of the entire record in a blind hunt for a nugget of harmful error buried somewhere in mounds of briefing and oral arguments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).