Skip to main content
· 10/8/1982

Schweitzer v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 452 A.2d 735
  • 306 Pa. Super. 300
  • 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that injuries to woman, who was pushed into her automobile and beaten inside automobile by operator of motorcycle, did not arise out of maintenance and use of motor vehicle
  • holding that injuries to woman, who was pushed into her automobile and ■beaten inside automobile by operator of motorcycle, did not arise out of maintenance and use of motor vehicle
  • holding that injuries to woman, who was pushed into her automobile and beaten inside automobile by operator of motorcycle, did not arise out of maintenance or use of a motor vehicle
  • holding that injuries to woman, who was pushed into her automobile and beaten inside automobile by operator of 10 motorcycle, did not arise out of maintenance and use of motor vehicle
  • “‘butfor’ causation, i.e., a cause and result relationship, is enough to satisfy this provision of the policy.”
  • injuries suffered by car owner who was beaten while in the vehicle did not arise from the use or maintenance of a motor vehicle as a motor vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosky, Wieand, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.