Schweiss v. Sisters of Mercy, St. Louis, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting as “a distinction without a difference” the argument that “the reimbursement provision at issue in this case is different from [a subrogation provision] because it involves the assignment of the proceeds, not an assignment of the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).