Skip to main content
· 4/2/1877

Schwarz v. Oppold

Citations

  • 7 Daly 121

Syllabus

<p>In an action upon a promissory note, the defendant, under a general denial, may prove as a defense a fraudulent alteration of the note made after its execution.</p> <p>Quaere, whether, upon principle, such a defense is not new matter which should be set up in the answer. Per Charles P. Daly, Chief Justice.</p> <p>Judgment as for want of an answer cannot be given at trial, for the reason that the defendant there testifies that he did not verify his answer to the verified complaint. An objection at the trial that a pleading is unverified is too late.</p>

Judges: Daly, Hoesen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.