Skip to main content
· 11/13/2009

Schwartz v. Vukson

Citations

  • 67 A.D.3d 1398
  • 889 N.Y.S.2d 780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The existence of an ambiguity will not preclude summary judgment unless resolution of that ambiguity depends upon extrinsic evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.