Schwartz v. Turner Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he termination letter was protected by a qualified privilege since the defendant made the communication upon a subject in which he had an interest to speak, and the communication was made to persons with a corresponding interest.” (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he termination letter was protected by a qualified privilege since the defendant made the communication upon a subject in which he had an interest to speak, and the communication was made to persons with a corresponding interest” (alterations, ellipses, and internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).