Schwartz v. Town Planning & Zoning Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• zoning regulations were valid when plaintiffs presented no evidence that they were ‘‘unreasonable, arbitrary or confiscatory’’
• \Evidence of the individual views of one member of a zoning commission is not competent to show the reasons actuating the commission or the grounds of its decision\
• “Evidence of the individual views of one member of a . . . commission is not competent to show the reasons actuating the commission or the grounds of its decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).