Skip to main content
· 9/24/1996

Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY.

Citations

  • 925 P.2d 1068
  • 186 Ariz. 617
  • 226 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 12
  • 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a superior court’s denial of a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum is not an appealable order but may be challenged by special action
  • reviewing trial court’s ruling on a motion to quash subpoena for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toci, Thompson, Fidel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.