Nevada Supreme Court· 3/4/2010
Schwartz v. Schwartz
Citations
- 225 P.3d 1273
- 126 Nev. 87
- 126 Nev. Adv. Rep. 8
- 2010 Nev. LEXIS 8
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that under an abuse of discretion standard, \we will not substitute our judgment for that of the district court\
- providing that the district court is \in the best position to hear and decide the facts of this case\
- explaining that under an abuse of discretion standard, \we will not substitute our judgment for that of the district court\
- providing that the district court is \in the best position to hear and decide the facts of this case\
- explaining that, under an abuse of discretion standard, this court will \not substitut[e] its own judgment for that of the district court\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- explaining that, under an abuse of discretion standard, this court will \not substitut[e] its own judgment for that of the district court\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hardesty, Cherry, Saitta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wolff v. WolffNevada Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 65×
- Buchanan v. BuchananNevada Supreme Court· 1974-06-05· cited 32×
- Sprenger v. SprengerNevada Supreme Court· 1994-07-26· cited 24×
- Forrest v. ForrestNevada Supreme Court· 1983-08-31· cited 21×
- Winn v. WinnNevada Supreme Court· 1970-01-16· cited 11×
- Daniel v. BakerNevada Supreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.