Schwartz v. Schwartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that failing to make a cogent argument as required by Rule 46(A)(8)(a) results in waiver of the issue on appeal
• \[Dlid you ever have any conversations with the estate guardian about compensation for her coming in there? ... Yes.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The Estate of George A. Henry v. Nadene Woods
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-05-19· cited 11×
• Estate of Prickett v. Womersley
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2009-05-13· cited 9×
• Mohammed Nadeem v. Shahidatul Abubakar (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-07-08
• Thomas Meranda v. Mary Elizabeth Spaw
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-12-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• West v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-09-24· cited 68×
• Estate of Hann v. Hann
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-06-07· cited 21×
• Walting v. BROWN, EXTRX., ETC.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1965-11-29· cited 20×
• Banjo Corp. v. Pembor
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-08-31· cited 11×
• Carr v. Carr
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-09-05· cited 6×
• In re the Liquidation of United Savings & Loan Ass'n of Gary
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-08-07· cited 2×