Skip to main content
· 11/3/1924

Schwartz v. Sacks

Citations

  • 2 F.2d 188
  • 55 App. D.C. 87
  • 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 1999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim that the telephone company invaded its customer's privacy was actionable in common pleas court
  • claim that telephone company invaded customer’s privacy was actionable in common pleas court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.