· 11/3/1924
Schwartz v. Sacks
Citations
- 2 F.2d 188
- 55 App. D.C. 87
- 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 1999
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claim that the telephone company invaded its customer's privacy was actionable in common pleas court
- claim that telephone company invaded customer’s privacy was actionable in common pleas court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.