Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/5/1988
Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Citations
- 208 Conn. 146
- 543 A.2d 1339
- 1988 Conn. LEXIS 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that just compensation means the actual value in money of the property
- holding that just compensation means the actual value in money of the property
- stating that just compensation does not include benefits, advantages, or damages incidental to the interest in real property and caused by the public project
- stating that just compensation does not include benefits, advantages, or damages incidental to the interest in real property and caused by the public project
- noting that it is for the Legislature to decide what, if any, other incidental damages are to be awarded beyond the Constitutional minimum of just compensation in a condemnation case
- noting that it is for the Legislature to decide what, if any, other incidental damages are to be awarded beyond the Constitutional minimum of just compensation in a condemnation case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.