Schwartz v. Leasametric, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discharge of employee to avoid paying commissions that he had earned did not violate clear mandate of public policy
• holding that discharge of employee to avoid paying commissions on future transactions did not violate clear mandate of public policy
• holding that discharge of employee to avoid paying commissions on future transactions did not violate clear mandate of public policy
• holding that discharge of employee to avoid paying commissions on future transactions did not violate clear mandate of public policy
• holding that no tort action would lie against an employer even if the employer fired employee to avoid paying him commissions.
• holding that an employment manual with a three-step progressive-discipline procedure gave rise to an implied contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).