· 11/4/1938
Schwartz v. Hygo Musical Products Co.
Citations
- 25 F. Supp. 408
- 40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 161
- 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that class representatives lacked 10 standing to seek protective order regarding subpoenas to non-class members
- finding that “in a class action, even a putative class action, the party seeking discovery from an unnamed class member must . . . first seek permission from the court”
- considering the merits of the matter but noting that the failure to seek the court’s permission could serve as a basis to grant the motion for a protective order
- “To show good cause, the moving party must articulate specific facts that show a clearly defined and serious injury resulting from the discovery sought; mere conclusory statements will not be sufficient.”
- “To show good cause, the moving party must articulate specific facts that show a clearly defined and serious injury resulting from the discovery sought; mere conclusory statements will not be sufficient.”
- “To show good cause, the moving party must articulate specific facts that show a clearly defined and serious injury resulting from the discovery sought; mere conclusory statements will not be sufficient.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woolsey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.