Skip to main content
· 11/4/1938

Schwartz v. Hygo Musical Products Co.

Citations

  • 25 F. Supp. 408
  • 40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 161
  • 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that class representatives lacked 10 standing to seek protective order regarding subpoenas to non-class members
  • finding that “in a class action, even a putative class action, the party seeking discovery from an unnamed class member must . . . first seek permission from the court”
  • considering the merits of the matter but noting that the failure to seek the court’s permission could serve as a basis to grant the motion for a protective order
  • “To show good cause, the moving party must articulate specific facts that show a clearly defined and serious injury resulting from the discovery sought; mere conclusory statements will not be sufficient.”
  • “To show good cause, the moving party must articulate specific facts that show a clearly defined and serious injury resulting from the discovery sought; mere conclusory statements will not be sufficient.”
  • “To show good cause, the moving party must articulate specific facts that show a clearly defined and serious injury resulting from the discovery sought; mere conclusory statements will not be sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woolsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.