Skip to main content
· 7/2/1921

Schwartz v. Hoerster

Citations

  • 93 N.J. Eq. 100
  • 114 A. 785
  • 8 Stock. 100
  • 1921 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting also that established exceptions to the warrant requirement include the automobile exception and a search incident to arrest
  • \An appellate court also generally must limit its consideration of the disputed facts to those expressly found by the trial court.\
  • “An appellate court also generally must limit its consideration of the disputed facts to those expressly found by the trial court.”
  • “a police officer has probable cause to search when that officer, through training or experience, detects the smell of marijuana”
  • To have probable cause to arrest, additional factors must be present to show that a particular person is the source of the odor; that is, the arresting officer must have probable cause to believe that a particular person smells of marijuana

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buchanan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.