· 8/11/1932
Schwartz v. Goldberg
Citations
- 60 F.2d 478
- 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 2549
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Regardless of whether the evidence * * * was actually relevant to the case, the jury was entitled to con- sider that evidence because it had been admitted without objection from either party.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buffington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.