Skip to main content
· 11/10/2003

Schwartz v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Citations

  • 127 S.W.3d 118
  • 2003 WL 22382575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that objection to ruling on one issue—in that case, Rule 401 prejudice, does not preserve objections on relevance of evidence
  • holding that error was waived when the appellant failed to timely object to repeated references about his alleged litigious nature
  • driver not negligent for mistakenly removing foot from the brake and causing vehicle to collide with vehicle in front of her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adele Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.