· 11/10/2003
Schwartz v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Citations
- 127 S.W.3d 118
- 2003 WL 22382575
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that objection to ruling on one issue—in that case, Rule 401 prejudice, does not preserve objections on relevance of evidence
- holding that error was waived when the appellant failed to timely object to repeated references about his alleged litigious nature
- driver not negligent for mistakenly removing foot from the brake and causing vehicle to collide with vehicle in front of her
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adele Hedges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.