Skip to main content
· 7/1/1901

Schwartz v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Citations

  • 105 La. 161

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>A party applying to the Supreme Court for a writ of review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals overruling an exception “of no cause of action,” and remanding the cause for a trial on the merits, is sufficiently protected by reserving to him the right to test before the Supreme Court the correctness of this judgment, on the review of the final judgment to be rendered in the case, if such review should become necessary.</p>

Judges: Nicholls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.