Schwardt v. County of Watonwan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because setback requirement was a condition county zoning administrator would later enforce, county board did not act arbitrarily in granting CUP
• noting that “[w]e have traditionally held CUP approvals to a more deferential standard of review than CUP denials”
• noting that the quality of evidence and testimony in a quasi-judicial proceeding does “not have to meet full judicial standards”
• noting that “[w]e have traditionally held CUP approvals to a more deferential standard of review than CUP denials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).