Skip to main content
· 6/30/1992

Schwanke, Schwanke & Associates v. Martin

Citations

  • 609 N.E.2d 654
  • 241 Ill. App. 3d 738
  • 182 Ill. Dec. 120
  • 1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 412
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1057

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the complaint does not state facts sufficient to show ripeness, dismissal is proper.”
  • dismissal should be vacated if motion cites wrong section to the plaintiffs prejudice
  • dismissal should be vacated if motion cites wrong section to the plaintiff's prejudice
  • dismissal must be vacated, if it was granted pursuant to a motion brought under the wrong section of the Code of Civil Procedure, and if it resulted in prejudice to plaintiff
  • “If the complaint does not state facts sufficient to show ripeness, dismissal is proper.”
  • “If the complaint does not state facts sufficient to show ripeness, dismissal is proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMORROW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.