Schwanda v. Woodbine Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an unregistered contractor cannot recover for home improvement services rendered pursuant to General Statutes § 20-429 (a)(8)
• remanding case to trial court to determine damages, after concluding that CUTPA violation had occurred
• failure to comply with Home Improvement Act is per se violation of CUTPA by virtue of a statutory provision stating that explicitly
• failure to comply with the Home Improvement Act is a per se violation of CUTPA by virtue of § 20-427 (c
• because plaintiffs actions violated Home Improvement Act, court bound to render judgment for defendant with respect to CUTPA count of counterclaim
• where trial court’s memorandum of decision makes it clear that it did not consider merits of claim, remand required to determine claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).