Skip to main content
· 3/4/1988

Schwalb v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Citations

  • 235 Va. 27
  • 1988 A.M.C. 2077
  • 365 S.E.2d 742
  • 4 Va. Law Rep. 1944
  • 1988 Va. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where a defendant’s robbery conviction was the primary, if not sole basis for the revocation of his probation, remand to the trial court was appropriate in light of the decision to vacate the robbery conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.