Schwalb v. Bromfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disentitlement was the only “remaining means of minimizing the prejudice to [appellee]”
• holding that disentitlement was the only “remaining means of minimizing the prejudice to [appellee]”
• holding \that we have discretion to dismiss the appeal of a civil litigant who becomes a fugitive to escape the effect of a civil judgment\
• stating that “[e]nforceability concerns . . . weigh[] heavily in favor of disentitlement”
• stating that “[e]nforceability concerns ... weigh[ ] heavily in favor of disentitlement”
• dismissing appeal by fugitive in part because any judgment rendered by district court after remand would be unenforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).