Schwab v. Schmidt

Citations

• 9 Teiss. 45
• 1911 La. App. LEXIS 131

Syllabus

<p>The provisions of the Code of Practice requiring the Judge to pronounce on the merits of an intervention at the same time that he decides the principal action, have no application to an opposition having for its object to set aside a seizure as having been effected on property not belonging to defendant but owned by the opponent.</p> <p>On the contrary, the Code of Practice particularly enjoins that such opposition shall be considered as a separate demand distinct front the suit in which the seizure was effected. C. P., 389, 394, 395, 398-</p>