Skip to main content
· 7/1/1987

Schuyt v. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Fund, Inc.

Citations

  • 663 F. Supp. 962
  • 56 U.S.L.W. 2056
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a pre-tax profit margin of 77.3% did not support a finding of excessive fees
  • finding that a profit margin of 77.3% 8 was not excessive, but noting that it could be depending on other factors, such as the quality of 9 the services or the strength of the board’s process
  • 77.3% profit margin was not excessive enough to support a 10 positive finding on profitability
  • profit margin of 77.3% was not excessive, but 7 noting that it could be depending on other factors, such as the quality of the services or the 8 strength of the board’s process
  • entering judgment for the defendants after a two-week trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert J. Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.