Schur v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a lawyer “agreed to and did supply [legal] services in New York for a New York business transaction,” jurisdiction existed under Section 302(a)(1
• “It is fair and reasonable for [a lawyer who provides services in connection with a New York matter] to . . . expect[] to defend these services in a New York court.”
• emphasis added, indicating portions of the cited paragraph deleted by Mirman

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).