Schumm v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the removal of the only prospective African-American juror by a peremptory challenge raised an inference of discrimination
• holding that a police officer who issued a citation to a driver for driving with improper headlights could not testify to whether the vehicle’s taillights complied with department of transportation regulations because it was a legal conclusion
• defendant was not allowed to call police officer to testify that defendant’s vehicle was in compliance with applicable regulations since such testimony would have resulted in the officer making a legal conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Goens v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-02-14· cited 13×
• Simmons v. Erie Insurance Exchange
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-08-11· cited 9×
• Freeman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-04-15· cited 6×
• William Goodwin v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-07-29
• Tyler Beathea v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-09-17
• Daniel Wahl and Saundra Wahl v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-05-12
• Demarcus Solvontez Davis v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2026-03-18

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Merrill v. Knauf Fiber Glass GmbH
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-07-29· cited 81×
• Kelly v. Levandoski
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-04-18· cited 77×
• Walker v. Lawson
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-08-04· cited 46×
• McMahan v. Snap on Tool Corp.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-05-22· cited 45×
• Schumm v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-05-21· cited 14×