Illinois Supreme Court· 9/26/1975
Schumann v. Industrial Commission
Citations
- 335 N.E.2d 425
- 61 Ill. 2d 241
- 1975 Ill. LEXIS 265
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the supreme court found no estoppel since no evidence showed that the insurance adjuster sought to mislead the claimant where the claim was filed six months after the limitations period expired
- the supreme court found no estoppel since no evidence showed that the insurance adjuster sought to mislead the claimant where the claim was filed six months after the limita tions period expired
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kluczynski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- International Harvester v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-01-27· cited 37×
- Domagalski v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 17×
- Tegeler v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-10-18· cited 14×
- City of Chicago v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 7×
- Herlihy Mid-Continent Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-08-13· cited 6×
- Beaudette v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-09-29· cited 3×
- Tegeler v. Industrial Comm'nIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-10-18
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.