Skip to main content
· 12/8/2010

Schuman v. INTERNATIONAL CONSUMER CORP.

Citations

  • 50 So. 3d 75
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18629
  • 2010 WL 4962841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a rule 1.540(b) motion “should not be summarily dismissed without an evidentiary hearing unless its allegations and accompanying affidavits fail to allege colorable entitlement to relief’
  • \[T]he motion for relief from judgment stated a claim of 'colorable entitlement to relief' that would require the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing before dismissing the motion.\
  • \[T]he motion for relief from judgment stated a claim of 'colorable entitlement to relief' that would require the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing before dismissing the motion.\
  • “[Tjhe motion for relief from judgment stated a claim of ‘colorable entitlement to relief that would require the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing before dismissing the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levine, Hazouri, Ciklin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.