Skip to main content
· 7/10/1920

Schumacher v. Jacobs

Citations

  • 107 Kan. 194
  • 191 P. 271
  • 1920 Kan. LEXIS 43

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Building Contract — Alleged Oral Agreement to Protect Adjacent Stone Wall Not Proven. ■ The record examined, and held sufficient to sustain a judgment for defendant in an action against a contractor for an alleged breach of an oral contract to protect the stone wall of a building adjacent to the place where the contractor was engaged in excavation- and foundation work for a new building.</p> <p>2. SAUSr-Instructions: ■ The-instructions to the jury examined, and when read and construed together are held to fairly state the issues and the pertinent law, and to be free from material error.</p>

Judges: Buech, Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.