Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 12/27/1994

Schulz v. Williams

Citations

  • 44 F.3d 48
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that states are \entitled to take steps to ensure that elections are 'fair and honest'\
  • holding that a New York statute requiring “an independent who seeks ... statewide office” to “gather the signatures of 15,000 registered voters” during a 42-day period fell “well within the constitutional bounds set by Storer”
  • finding that federal action to be placed on the ballot was precluded where candidate previously brought the same claim in state court
  • suggesting that existence of \statewide computer system . . . capable of checking the registration status\ of all New York voters might, once implemented, \change[] the calculus\ by which ballot access restrictions are to be evaluated
  • explaining that a state’s interest in “limiting the ballot to those candidates who have demonstrated support” is “by no means novel and ha[s] long enjoyed support in the case law”
  • holding third-party representative had standing because the party stood to suffer from “competition on the ballot from candidates that . . . were able to ‘avoid complying with the Election Laws’ and a resulting loss of votes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.