Schulz v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding prejudice where defense counsel failed to present alibi evidence, and conviction rested on testimony of only two eyewitnesses
• finding counsel ineffective for “breachfing] his duty to investigate [petitioner’s] case diligently”
• “In evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel based on 19 failure to investigate witnesses, courts place weight on a defendant’s ability to show that these witnesses would have had helpful information.”
• “In evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel based on failure to investigate witnesses, courts place weight on a defendant’s ability to show that these witnesses would have had helpful information” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).