Skip to main content
· 3/21/2012

Schulz v. Kroger Co.

Citations

  • 963 N.E.2d 1141
  • 2012 WL 1003467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment where employee observed the area five to ten minutes prior to the fall
  • granting summary judgment in store’s favor when an employee inspected area five to ten minutes before alleged fall and did not observe any potential hazards
  • granting summary judgment in store’s favor when an employee inspected area five to ten minutes before alleged fall and did not observe any potential hazards
  • granting summary judgment in store’s favor when an employee inspected area five to ten minutes before alleged fall and did not observe any potential hazards
  • granting summary judgment in store’s favor when an employee inspected area five to ten minutes before alleged fall and did not observe any potential hazards
  • imputing constructive notice where an employee had been in the area five to ten minutes prior would have the undesirable effect of mandating “an employee’s presence in every aisle at all times”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Friedlander, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.