Schultz v. Gotlund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because no common law or equitable right to subrogation is recognized in group health policies, absent express subrogation clause in policy, group health insurer had no right to share in proceeds of personal injury settlement between insured and tortfeasor
• group health insurer had no common law or equitable right to subrogation in personal injury settlement between insured and tortfeasor; absent express subrogation clause in policy, insurer had no right to share in proceeds of settlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).