Skip to main content
· 4/19/2012

Schultz v. Butterball, LLC

Citations

  • 402 S.W.3d 61
  • 2012 Ark. 163
  • 2012 Ark. LEXIS 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that having two prior convictions for the same offense committed in the same county, with a defendant of the same name is legally insufficient, standing alone, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was the same person who was convicted of the prior offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corbin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.