Skip to main content
· 8/3/1976

Schultz v. American National Bank & Trust Co.

Citations

  • 352 N.E.2d 310
  • 40 Ill. App. 3d 800
  • 1976 Ill. App. LEXIS 2846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant bank had the burden to plead the applicability of a statutory exception in action to cancel note for lack of consideration
  • where properly alleged facts in affidavits in support of a motion for summary judgment are not contradicted by counteraffidavits, the facts so averred must be taken as true
  • where properly alleged facts in affidavits in support of a motion for summary judgment are not contradicted by counteraffidavits, the facts so averred must be taken as true
  • “The factual issues which are disputed must be material to the essential elements of the cause of action or defense and those which are unrelated, regardless of how sharply controverted, do not warrant the denial of summary judgment if otherwise proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dixon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.