Schulman v. Spera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming application of § 3C1.2 because the evidence showed that a loaded firearm fell from the defendant’s pocket while he struggled with an officer
• affirming application of § 3C1.2 because “something more” than possessing a firearm during flight is required and evidence showed that a loaded firearm fell out of defendant’s pocket while he struggled with an officer
• \Traditional principles of contract law guide our interpretation of the terms and performance of a plea agreement.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).