Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/22/1988
Schulman v. Franklin & Marshall College
Citations
- 538 A.2d 49
- 371 Pa. Super. 345
- 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy available only where the party seeking it establishes all four (4) prerequisites.
- “A college is a unique institution which, to the degree possible, must be self-governing and the courts should not become involved in that process unless the process has been found to be biased, prejudicial or lacking in due process”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Cavanaugh, Brosky, Sole, Montemuro, Tamilia, Kelly, Popovich, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-17· cited 387×
- Swartley v. HoffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-12· cited 86×
- Boehm v. University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-18· cited 46×
- PSI Upsilon of Philadelphia v. University of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-16· cited 32×
- Gati v. University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-05-08· cited 18×
- In Re Barnes FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-10· cited 14×
- Kimberg v. University of ScrantonThird Circuit· 2010-10-27· cited 14×
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of the Holy GhostSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-12-29· cited 11×
- Temple Association of University Professionals, American Federation of Teachers Local 4531 v. Temple University—Of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-23· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Credit Alliance Corp. v. Philadelphia Minit-Man Car Wash Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 62×
- Independent State Store Union v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-02· cited 42×
- Unionville-Chadds Ford School District v. RotteveelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-04· cited 34×
- Cosner v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-21· cited 25×
- Cohen v. PelagattiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-05-31· cited 14×
- American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists v. ThornburghE.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-06-17· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. SchallCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-30· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.