Schull Construction Co. v. Board of Regents of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statutes setting forth the procedures and requirements for concluding contracts with governmental bodies were enacted for the purpose of protecting the public, not the parties who submitted bids on the contracts
• statute provided that \[a]ll contracts shall be made and set forth in writing. . .\ so resolution of award was non-binding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).