Schuler v. Abbott Laboratories

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the privilege is inapplicable where the defendant’s “actions were unrelated to or antagonistic to the interest that gave rise to the privilege”
• stating that the privilege is inapplicable where the defendant’s “actions were unrelated to or antago- nistic to the interest that gave rise to the privilege“
• finding no action directed at a third party where the defendant merely told the plaintiff that defendant would seek to enforce the non-competition agreement in court
• rejecting the argument that the defendant took action directed at third parties because the defendant knew that enforcement of the non-competition agreement would dissuade those third parties from hiring the plaintiff where the enforcement action was not directed at the third parties
• “Plaintiff states a cause of action only if he alleges a business expectancy with a specific third party.”
• “Plaintiff states a cause of action only if he alleges a business expectancy with a specific third party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).