Schulenburg & Boeckler Lumber Co. v. Strimple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a PCR application will not be procedurally barred under a hyper-technical analysis, where so many procedural irregularities occurred during the judicial process as to deprive the applicant of due process
• permitting a successive PCR application where multiple procedural irregularities, including the denial of a direct appeal, denied applicant the benefit of due process
• the rules barring successive petitions for post-conviction relief mus be relaxed when the defendant did not receive due process during the prior post-conviction litigation}; Hernandez v. State, 133 Idaho 794, 992 P.2d 789, 793 (App.1999

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).