Schukart v. Gerousbeck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking judicial notice of rainy and windy weather conditions common to the region in the winter to determine whether such conditions would render a railroad 456 State v. Callen crossing extra-hazardous
• taking judicial notice of rainy and windy weather conditions common to the region in the winter to determine whether such conditions would render a railroad 456 State v. Callen crossing extra-hazardous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-09-20· cited 15×
• Sargent v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-12-29· cited 10×
• Napier v. Southern Pacific Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-10-30· cited 9×
• Carlson v. Southern Pacific Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-11-18· cited 7×
• Seekins v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-05-27· cited 4×
• State v. Callen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-14· cited 4×
• Murphy v. Southern Pacific Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-09-07· cited 3×
• Spencer v. Southern Pacific Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1953-09-10· cited 3×
• Hunt v. Douglas
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-10-14· cited 2×
• Henderson v. C-K, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-12-30

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Finn v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1950-05-31· cited 20×
• Case v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1945-05-09· cited 16×
• Rogers v. Southern Pacific Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1951-02-21· cited 15×
• Blackford v. Boak
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1914-10-06· cited 14×