Schuff Steel v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although claimant was a party to the special action, he had not actively participated in it “because the apportionment dispute is between the employer’s carrier and the Special Fund Division
• noting that although claimant was a party to the special action, he had not actively participated in it “because the apportionment dispute is between the employer’s carrier and the Special Fund Division
• equal protection guarantees “require a rational relationship between every statutory classification and a legitimate statutory purpose”
• distinguishing special fund statutes that provide benefits to injured workers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).