Schubach v. Redelsheimer
Citations
- 92 Wash. 124
- 158 P. 739
- 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1128
Syllabus
<p>Executors and Administrators — Claims—Presentation — Executors Under Nonintervention Will — Statutes. The presentation of a claim to the court is not a condition precedent to an action against executors under a nonintervention will, in view of Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1444, authorizing the settlement of such estates without the intervention of court except to admit the will to probate and determine the solvency of the estate; and this, notwithstanding the proviso to the section to the effect that all claims must be paid within one year after notice to creditors.</p> <p>Same. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1487, providing that when an executor is a creditor, his claim must be presented to the court, has no application to estates settled without the intervention of court under a nonintervention will under Id., § 1444, as the two methods of settling estates are distinct, and the court has no jurisdiction of claims under the latter.</p>
Judges: Bausman, Holcomb, Main, Morris, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Guye v. GuyeWashington Supreme Court· 1911-05-10· cited 78×
- Moore v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court· 1898-07-12· cited 15×
- Shufeldt v. HughesWashington Supreme Court· 1909-10-11· cited 12×
- Fulmer v. GableWashington Supreme Court· 1913-06-03· cited 9×
- English-McCaffery Logging Co. v. CloweWashington Supreme Court· 1902-09-15· cited 6×
- Clark v. BakerWashington Supreme Court· 1913-10-24· cited 6×
- Guye v. GuyeWashington Supreme Court· 1911-04-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.