· 3/31/2006
Schroer v. Billington
Citations
- 424 F. Supp. 2d 203
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14278
- 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,334
- 97 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1506
- 2006 WL 845806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t may be time to revisit [the] conclusion . . . that discrimination against 10 transsexuals because they are transsexuals is literally discrimination because of sex.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.