Schroedl v. McTague

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold that the income tax returns sufficiently acknowledged an existing indebtedness [by attached schedules of interest paid during the year for which the return was made] which could be identified by extrinsic evidence ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shinrone, Inc. v. Tasco, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1979-09-19· cited 42×
• Pear v. Grand Forks Motel Associates
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-10-01· cited 18×
• Schroedl v. McTague
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1969-07-24· cited 12×
• Schroedl v. McTague
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1966-09-20· cited 10×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reynolds v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 1949-05-02· cited 27×
• Stebens v. Wilkinson
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1957-12-17· cited 13×
• In re Estate of McCollum
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-06-13· cited 9×
• Knapp v. Knapp
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1959-11-17· cited 8×