Schroeder v. Tilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nothing in the text of [the section] suggests that the admissible propensity evidence would be sufficient, by itself, to convict a person of any crime. [The] [section [] relates to admissibility, not suffi ciency.”
• change in law admitting evidence of defendants’ prior sexual offenses did not violate Ex Post Facto Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).