Schroeder v. Partin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that owner of corporate franchise was competent to testify as to loss of business value suffered by franchisee due to franchisor's breach
• holding that owner of corporate franchise was competent to testify as to loss of business value suffered by franchisee due to franchisor’s breach
• holding the liquidated damages clause was enforceable and recognizing a prevailing party in a civil action to recover on a commercial transaction shall be allowed a reasonable attorney fee
• owner of property competent witness to its value, “ ‘as he is presumed to be familiar with its value by reasons of inquiries, comparisons, purchases and sales’ ”
• “It is a settled rule in Idaho that the owner of property is a competent witness to its value, as he is presumed to be familiar with its value by reason of inquiries, comparisons, purchases and sales.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).