Schroeder, Siegfried, Ryan & Vidas v. Modern Electronic Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a]lthough the attorney’s charging lien existed at common law and at equity, it is now wholly governed by statute”
• holding that a Minnesota charging lien statute that permitted attorney’s lien to attach “upon the interest of his client in any money or property involved in or affected by any proceeding in which he may have been employed” included patent and intellectual property rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).